On 17 January 2019, Prof Jon Gibbins, UKCCSRC Director, gave written and oral evidence at an inquiry into CCUS.
The scope of the inquiry was to examine the Government’s commitment to deploying CCUS technology and whether it has a “Plan B” to meet the UK’s climate change targets, should desired cost reductions not materialise.
Today, sees the release of the BEIS Committee Report on Carbon capture usage and storage: third time lucky?
The Government should ‘green light’ carbon capture technology, say MPs
The Government needs to move away from vague and ambiguous targets and give a clear policy direction to ensure the UK seizes the industrial and decarbonisation benefits of carbon capture usage and storage (CCUS), says the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee in a report published today.
- Read the summary
- Read the conclusions and recommendations
- Read the full report: Carbon Capture Usage and Storage: third time lucky?
- Download the PDF
The report says CCUS is necessary to meet national and international climate change targets at least cost and argues the technology could play a significant role in supporting productivity growth outside London and the South East.
Turbulent policy support
The UK is considered to have one of the most favourable environments globally for CCUS, but the technology has suffered from 15 years of turbulent policy support, including the cancellation of two major competitions at a late stage. No commercial-scale plant has yet been constructed in the UK.
Carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) is a set of technologies which can together capture carbon dioxide from waste gases, and either ‘lock up’ this carbon dioxide in long-term storage or use it in industrial processes.
What will happen if CCUS is not deployed?
The report notes that in the UK, failure to deploy CCUS could double the cost of meeting our targets under the Climate Change Act 2008, rising from approximately 1% to 2% of GDP per annum in 2050.
Failure to deploy CCUS would also mean the UK could not credibly adopt a ‘net zero emissions’ target in line with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C aspiration. This latter target is a more ambitious policy on which the Committee on Climate Change will set out next week (on 2nd May) whether the Government should commit to a net-zero target and the date to achieve it.
The report recognises the Energy Minister’s personal commitment and support for CCUS but finds there is a lack of clarity concerning the Government’s ambitions for CCUS, both in terms of time-scale for deployment of CCUS and the level of costs reductions the Government is demanding from the technology before it gives it support.
Anna Turley, Labour MP for Redcar and Member of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, said: “The UK has an opportunity to lead the world in the development of a new CCUS industry. In addition to helping to tackle UK carbon emissions, CCUS can play a crucial role in delivering much needed investment in skills and infrastructure and supporting regional growth and jobs.
“The current Energy Minister has been a champion for CCUS, and there have been some encouraging recent developments, but the CCUS industry has been the victim of years of turbulent policy support and suffered a series of false dawns. The Government now needs to give the ‘green-light’ to CCUS and ensure that we seize the domestic growth and jobs opportunities of this modern, green industry.
“CCUS is crucial to meeting the UK’s climate change targets and will be vital to achieving a ‘net zero’ target. But Government support is needed to make CCUS a reality. The Treasury needs to shake off the blinkers in its attitude to CCUS, take a more nuanced approach to the costs but also recognise the benefits. CCUS is the best and most cost-effective way to reduce our carbon emissions. Without CCUS many of our heavy industries could face closure. CCUS has a critical role to play in decarbonising our economy and modernising UK industry – the Government should now throw its full support behind CCUS and put the right policy levers in place to ensure that this technology can deliver on its potential.”
Government should provide clarity
Rather than seeking unspecified cost reductions, the report says the Government should kick-start CCUS by aiming to bring forwards projects at least cost. The report also says the ambition to “deploy CCUS at scale during the 2030s” is so broad as to be meaningless, recommending the Government provide clarity by adopting specific targets in line with the Committee on Climate Change’s recommendation [see paragraph 16 of the report].
The Government has set a target to commission the first CCUS facility by the mid-2020s. Five clusters – Teesside, Humberside, Merseyside, South Wales, North East Scotland – have been identified as well suited to early CCUS deployment. The report recommends this ambition is raised to target the development of first CCUS projects in at least three clusters by 2025.
The report also recommends that the Government consider an alternative to running a third competition for funding and urgently consult on approaches to allocate funding for CCUS industry clusters, to ensure that the approach selected promotes collaboration and benefits CCUS development across the UK.
CCUS wider benefits
The report recommends that the forthcoming Comprehensive Spending Review take account not only of CCUS’ costs, but also its wider benefits – notably to extend the lifetime of heavy industries which will otherwise need to close under the requirements of the Climate Change Act. The Committee also recommends the Government task the National Instructure Commission – or a third party – to conduct a cost benefit analysis of the potential role of CCUS to decarbonise industrial emissions and that the results of this assessment should be taken into account during decision-making on spending for national infrastructure.
The report recognises CCUS as a particularly useful technology in tackling carbon emissions, with its potential application to many different areas of the economy. For example, carbon capture technology can decarbonise waste gases from power stations and industrial facilities; help to produce clean hydrogen fuel from natural gas; and remove greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere via bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) or direct air CCS (DACCS).
As part of this inquiry, the BEIS Committee held an evidence hearing in Teesside where it questioned representatives from the five key areas for CCUS industry clusters (Teesside, Humberside, Merseyside, South Wales, North East Scotland).
This press release was originally posted here.
1. A full list of recommendations and conclusions are available on p27
2. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) – here the captured carbon dioxide is transported (by ship or pipeline) for long term storage in geological formations; the UK has a large number of potential offshore storage sites, particularly in the North Sea. Carbon capture and use (CCU) – this makes use of the captured carbon in industrial processes, for example in enhanced oil recovery or the manufacture of chemicals and building materials.
3. CCUS evidence hearings: On 17 January 2019, the Committee held an evidence session in Teesside and heard from representatives from the five key areas for CCUS industry clusters (Teesside, Humberside, Merseyside, South Wales, North East Scotland). On Wednesday 21 November, the BEIS Committee questioned Climate Change Minister Claire Perry on the Government’s Clean Growth Strategy, international climate change targets and the Committee’s current inquiry on Carbon Capture Usage and Storage (CCUS). The BEIS Committee also held an evidence hearing on 6 November for this inquiry – 06 Nov 2018 – Carbon Capture Usage and Storage – oral evidence
Media inquiries: Gary Calder firstname.lastname@example.org / 020 7219 7556 or Oliver Florence email@example.com / 07720 202 985
Committee Membership: Rachel Reeves MP (Chair) (Lab, Leeds West) Vernon Coaker MP (Lab, Gedling) Drew Hendry MP (SNP, Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey) Stephen Kerr MP (Con, Stirling) Peter Kyle MP (Lab, Hove) Mr Ian Liddell-Grainger MP (Con, Bridgwater and West Somerset) Rachel Maclean MP (Con, Redditch) Albert Owen MP (Lab, Ynys Môn), Mark Pawsey MP (Con, Rugby) Antoinette Sandbach MP (Con, Eddisbury) Anna Turley MP (Lab, Redcar).